[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260113231036.0b10f4a9@foz.lan>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 23:10:36 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>, Mauro
Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan
<skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] scripts/kernel-doc: some fixes to kernel-doc
comments
Em Tue, 13 Jan 2026 22:49:43 +0100
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> escreveu:
> Em Tue, 13 Jan 2026 13:55:18 -0700
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
>
> > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> writes:
> >
> > "flowers"? Did the LLM put that out too? :)
Heh, asking it to be funny and use figures of speech gave a funny
yet precise description:
<llm>
There are hidden gremlins and linguistic shadows lurking in the
kernel‑doc.py comments.
Summon them with the aid of an LLM (gpt‑oss 14B), executed locally
like a sorcerer’s spell, using this incantation:
review English grammar and syntax at the comments on the code below:
<cat scripts/kernel-doc.py>
The oracle did not yield a bouquet of roses; instead, it revealed
a handful of wilted blossoms. Gather the radiant ones, and toss
the withered ones into the abyss.
</llm>
If you ever see a patch description like that from my side, you can
be certain that it was a LLM-generated one ;-)
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists