linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v1 0/8] acpi/x86: s2idle: Introduce and implement runtime standby ABI for ACPI s0ix platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ca00958-13e5-4732-b500-aa9673a4c965@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:48:30 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@...heas.dev>
Cc: bob.beckett@...labora.com, bookeldor@...il.com, hadess@...ess.net,
 jaap@...tsma.org, kernel@...labora.com, lennart@...ttering.net,
 linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mccann@....edu,
 rafael@...nel.org, richard@...hsie.com, sebastian.reichel@...labora.com,
 superm1@...nel.org, systemd-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, xaver.hugl@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/8] acpi/x86: s2idle: Introduce and implement runtime
 standby ABI for ACPI s0ix platforms

Hello,

On 1/12/26 23:33, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Dec 2025 at 12:27, Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@...heas.dev> wrote:
>>
>> This series introduces a new runtime standby ABI to allow firing Modern
>> Standby firmware notifications that modify hardware appearance from userspace
>> without suspending the kernel. This allows userspace to set the inactivity
>> state of the device so that it looks like it is asleep (e.g., flashing the
>> power button) while still being able to perform basic computations.
>>
>> snip
>>
>> base-commit: 9448598b22c50c8a5bb77a9103e2d49f134c9578
>> --
>> 2.52.0
>>
> 
> Happy new year everyone
> 
> Small bump on this as all of us are starting to get back from holidays
> 
> I still have to bump an asus series before I get back to this. I would
> appreciate some feedback in the interim.
> 
> I think targeting 6.20/7.0? is unrealistic so there is no rush from my side
> 
> Antheas

Thanks a lot for sending these patches! I briefly looked through them
last week and will make another iteration soon.

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry