[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWYk_qGvA9Kn0xGe@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 10:57:02 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satya.prabhala@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: smccc: default ARM_SMCCC_SOC_ID to disabled
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 10:24:06PM -0800, Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala wrote:
> The ARM SMCCC SoC ID driver is currently enabled by default and publishes
> SMCCC-provided SoC identification into /sys/bus/soc/devices/socX/*.
>
> On platforms where a vendor SoC driver already exposes widely-consumed
> attributes (e.g. Qualcomm socinfo [1]), enabling the SMCCC driver changes
> the format of /sys/devices/soc0/soc_id (e.g. "jep106:XXYY:ZZZZ" instead
> of a vendor logical ID like "519") and breaks existing userspace consumers.
Isn't the fundamental issue here that you have multiple callers of
soc_device_register() and your userspace is only looking at soc0?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists