linux-kernel - [PATCH] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Block the driver from probing on more QC platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20260113-topic-cpufreq_block-v1-1-91f27df19028@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:53:27 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com>, 
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Block the driver from probing on more
 QC platforms

From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>

Add a number of QC platforms to the blocklist, they all use either the
qcom-cpufreq-hw or scmi-cpufreq drivers.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
---
Note: the "qcom,glymur" compatible is not in -next, but is already
approved by krzk and should be merged shortly
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
index 1708179b2610..de5a33feebb4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
@@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id blocklist[] __initconst = {
 	{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra234", },
 
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,apq8096", },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,glymur", },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,kaanapali", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8909", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8996", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8998", },
@@ -171,6 +173,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id blocklist[] __initconst = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdx75", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6115", },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6125", },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6150", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6350", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6375", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm7225", },
@@ -181,6 +185,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id blocklist[] __initconst = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8550", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8650", },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8750", },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,x1p42100", },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100", },
 
 	{ .compatible = "st,stih407", },
 	{ .compatible = "st,stih410", },

---
base-commit: 0f853ca2a798ead9d24d39cad99b0966815c582a
change-id: 20260113-topic-cpufreq_block-c9b7c6863a41

Best regards,
-- 
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>