[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP4nuTX556F6a+aMndYayu-29u-SsYi0g0ie8ONz8b5GStgv-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 19:25:34 +0800
From: Nick Xie <xieqinick@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: neil.armstrong@...aro.org, khilman@...libre.com, jbrunet@...libre.com,
martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com,
christianshewitt@...il.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, nick@...das.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: amlogic: add Khadas VIM1S binding
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> 于2026年1月14日周三 18:33写道:
>
> On 14/01/2026 11:07, Nick Xie wrote:
> > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> 于2026年1月14日周三 16:51写道:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 02:25:48PM +0800, Nick Xie wrote:
> >>> Add devicetree binding for Khadas VIM1S board based on
> >>> Amlogic S4 S905Y4 SoC.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nick Xie <nick@...das.com>
> >>
> >> You still have the same From/SoB mismatch.
> >
> > OK, I will fix it in next version.
> >
> >>
> >>> ---
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml | 6 ++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml
> >>> index 08d9963fe9259..55663e0f7f915 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml
> >>> @@ -247,6 +247,12 @@ properties:
> >>> - amlogic,aq222
> >>> - const: amlogic,s4
>
> Look here
>
> >>>
> >>> + - description: Boards with the Amlogic Meson S4 S905Y4 SoC
> >>> + items:
> >>> + - enum:
> >>
> >> Yopu already have exactly such enum with such description, so your
> >> compatible goes there. Look - it is called "Boards" - plural.
> >
> > The exist board aq222 is based on SoC S905X2, but the new board vim1s
> > is baed on S905Y4,
> > they are different SoC, so we need to put S905Y4 under S805X2 ?
>
> What is the point of having two separate lists with enums ending the
> same SoC compatible?
Actually S805X2 and S905Y4 are different SoC. So maybe like this ?
S805X2:
- description: Boards with the Amlogic Meson S4 S805X2 SoC
items:
- enum:
- amlogic,aq222
- const: amlogic,s805x2
- const: amlogic,s4
S905Y4:
- description: Boards with the Amlogic Meson S4 S905Y4 SoC
items:
- enum:
- khadas,vim1s
- const: amlogic,s905y4
- const: amlogic,s4
Same as Amlogic A311D & S922X
S922X:
- const: amlogic,s922x
- const: amlogic,g12b
A311D:
- const: amlogic,a311d
- const: amlogic,g12b
>
> >
> >>
> >>> + - khadas,vim1s
> >>> + - const: amlogic,s4
>
> And here.
>
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Krzysztof
> >>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists