[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33fef62fd821f669fcdc999e54c4035a4e91b47d.1768389889.git.zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 19:32:50 +0800
From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...ux.dev>
To: hannes@...xchg.org,
hughd@...gle.com,
mhocko@...e.com,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
muchun.song@...ux.dev,
david@...nel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
ziy@...dia.com,
harry.yoo@...cle.com,
yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev,
imran.f.khan@...cle.com,
kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com,
yuanchu@...gle.com,
weixugc@...gle.com,
chenridong@...weicloud.com,
mkoutny@...e.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com,
apais@...ux.microsoft.com,
lance.yang@...ux.dev
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 23/30] mm: do not open-code lruvec lock
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Now we have lruvec_unlock(), lruvec_unlock_irq() and
lruvec_unlock_irqrestore(), but not the paired lruvec_lock(),
lruvec_lock_irq() and lruvec_lock_irqsave().
There is currently no use case for lruvec_lock_irqsave(), so only
introduce lruvec_lock() and lruvec_lock_irq(), and change all open-code
places to use these helper function. This looks cleaner and prepares for
reparenting LRU pages, preventing user from missing RCU lock calls due to
open-code lruvec lock.
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 5 +++++
mm/vmscan.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index f1556759d0d3f..4b6f20dc694ba 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1499,6 +1499,11 @@ static inline struct lruvec *parent_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec)
return mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, lruvec_pgdat(lruvec));
}
+static inline void lruvec_lock_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec)
+{
+ spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+}
+
static inline void lruvec_unlock(struct lruvec *lruvec)
{
spin_unlock(&lruvec->lru_lock);
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index f206d4dac9e77..c48ff6e05e004 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2020,7 +2020,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
lru_add_drain();
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
nr_taken = isolate_lru_folios(nr_to_scan, lruvec, &folio_list,
&nr_scanned, sc, lru);
@@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
count_memcg_events(lruvec_memcg(lruvec), item, nr_scanned);
__count_vm_events(PGSCAN_ANON + file, nr_scanned);
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
if (nr_taken == 0)
return 0;
@@ -2051,7 +2051,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
count_memcg_events(lruvec_memcg(lruvec), item, nr_reclaimed);
count_vm_events(PGSTEAL_ANON + file, nr_reclaimed);
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
lru_note_cost_unlock_irq(lruvec, file, stat.nr_pageout,
nr_scanned - nr_reclaimed);
@@ -2130,7 +2130,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
lru_add_drain();
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
nr_taken = isolate_lru_folios(nr_to_scan, lruvec, &l_hold,
&nr_scanned, sc, lru);
@@ -2141,7 +2141,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
__count_vm_events(PGREFILL, nr_scanned);
count_memcg_events(lruvec_memcg(lruvec), PGREFILL, nr_scanned);
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
while (!list_empty(&l_hold)) {
struct folio *folio;
@@ -2197,7 +2197,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
count_memcg_events(lruvec_memcg(lruvec), PGDEACTIVATE, nr_deactivate);
mod_node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_ANON + file, -nr_taken);
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
lru_note_cost_unlock_irq(lruvec, file, 0, nr_rotated);
trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active(pgdat->node_id, nr_taken, nr_activate,
nr_deactivate, nr_rotated, sc->priority, file);
@@ -3832,9 +3832,9 @@ static void walk_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, struct lru_gen_mm_walk *walk)
}
if (walk->batched) {
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
reset_batch_size(walk);
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
}
cond_resched();
@@ -3993,7 +3993,7 @@ static bool inc_max_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long seq, int swappiness
if (seq < READ_ONCE(lrugen->max_seq))
return false;
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!seq_is_valid(lruvec));
@@ -4008,7 +4008,7 @@ static bool inc_max_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long seq, int swappiness
if (inc_min_seq(lruvec, type, swappiness))
continue;
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
cond_resched();
goto restart;
}
@@ -4043,7 +4043,7 @@ static bool inc_max_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long seq, int swappiness
/* make sure preceding modifications appear */
smp_store_release(&lrugen->max_seq, lrugen->max_seq + 1);
unlock:
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
return success;
}
@@ -4739,7 +4739,7 @@ static int evict_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
scanned = isolate_folios(nr_to_scan, lruvec, sc, swappiness, &type, &list);
@@ -4748,7 +4748,7 @@ static int evict_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
if (evictable_min_seq(lrugen->min_seq, swappiness) + MIN_NR_GENS > lrugen->max_seq)
scanned = 0;
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
if (list_empty(&list))
return scanned;
@@ -4786,9 +4786,9 @@ static int evict_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
walk = current->reclaim_state->mm_walk;
if (walk && walk->batched) {
walk->lruvec = lruvec;
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
reset_batch_size(walk);
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
}
mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD + reclaimer_offset(sc),
@@ -5226,7 +5226,7 @@ static void lru_gen_change_state(bool enabled)
for_each_node(nid) {
struct lruvec *lruvec = get_lruvec(memcg, nid);
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!seq_is_valid(lruvec));
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!state_is_valid(lruvec));
@@ -5234,12 +5234,12 @@ static void lru_gen_change_state(bool enabled)
lruvec->lrugen.enabled = enabled;
while (!(enabled ? fill_evictable(lruvec) : drain_evictable(lruvec))) {
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
cond_resched();
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
}
cond_resched();
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists