linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/20] Samsung S2MPG10 regulator and S2MPG11 PMIC drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <08a972c7a0fd17260a91f09ce0201167cb6ed7fd.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:15:34 +0000
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
  Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,  Bartosz Golaszewski	 <brgl@...ev.pl>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij	
 <linusw@...nel.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>, Peter Griffin	
 <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, Juan
 Yescas <jyescas@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Bartosz
 Golaszewski	 <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/20] Samsung S2MPG10 regulator and S2MPG11 PMIC
 drivers

On Tue, 2026-01-13 at 17:28 +0000, André Draszik wrote:
> Hi Mark, Lee,
> 
> On Tue, 2026-01-13 at 16:20 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 11:22:44AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > 
> > > MFD pieces look okay to me.
> > 
> > > Once Mark provides his AB, I can merge the set.
> > 
> > Given that the bulk of the series is regulator changes I'd been
> > expecting to take it?
> 
> Just FYI:
> 1) I just noticed I have to rebase/resend this mainly due to
> patch context of the binding updates.

I take this back, I got mixed up with a different branch. This series
doesn't need rebasing and is good to go.

A.

> 
> 2) this series depends on another MFD series of mine
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260113-s5m-alarm-v3-0-855a19db1277@linaro.org/
> (again only due to patch context) which is still pending.
> 
> I was under the (perhaps incorrect) impression that changes that touch
> MFD always go via the MFD tree. I guess that's not the case. I'll update
> the relevant phrasing in the cover letter with whatever you two decide :-)
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Andre'