[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWe9QI0ZoqjFCjSd@google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:58:56 +0000
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@...gle.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, jgg@...dia.com, robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skolothumtho@...dia.com,
xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com, smostafa@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v6 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-test: Add nested
s1bypass/s1dssbypass coverage
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 12:20:17PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> STE in a nested case requires both S1 and S2 fields. And this makes the use
> case different from the existing one.
>
> Add coverage for previously failed cases shifting between S2-only and S1+S2
> STEs.
>
> Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@...gle.com>
> ---
> .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists