[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL3q7H4rLMtmWTe4jHrYMnUbOkJb_5rMUfB8YUNhJ=JXnJp5AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:20:59 +0000
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...nel.org>
To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fail priority tickets in maybe_fail_all_tickets
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 5:07 PM Jiasheng Jiang
<jiashengjiangcool@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Differential analysis reveals that while btrfs_try_granting_tickets
Let's pause for a second.
This is yet another patch where you mention this "differential analysis".
Please try to understand the code instead of comparing parts of the
code and assuming any differences mean a bug or that we need to do
something.
> correctly iterates over both space_info->priority_tickets and
> space_info->tickets, the maybe_fail_all_tickets function only processes
> space_info->tickets.
Yes, and there's a reason for that.
>
> In scenarios where the filesystem is aborted (BTRFS_FS_ERROR), we rely
> on maybe_fail_all_tickets() to wake up all tasks waiting on reservations
> and notify them of the error. Because priority tickets are currently
> ignored, tasks waiting on them (typically high-priority flush workers)
> will not be woken up, leading to permanent tasks hangs.
Wrong.
We never wait on a ticket's waitqueue when it's a priority ticket...
That's why maybe_fail_all_tickets() ignores the priority tickets list.
Doing this "differential analysis" without understanding all the code
and how different parts interact, and without hitting the bug or
seeing someone reporting such a hang, is just a waste of time.
>
> Fix this inconsistency by updating maybe_fail_all_tickets() to iterate
> over both priority_tickets and tickets lists, ensuring all waiting tasks
> are properly errored out during a filesystem abort.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
> index 6babbe333741..09c76df8dbc8 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
> @@ -1120,6 +1120,7 @@ static bool maybe_fail_all_tickets(struct btrfs_space_info *space_info)
> struct reserve_ticket *ticket;
> u64 tickets_id = space_info->tickets_id;
> const int abort_error = BTRFS_FS_ERROR(fs_info);
> + struct list_head *head = &space_info->priority_tickets;
>
> trace_btrfs_fail_all_tickets(fs_info, space_info);
>
> @@ -1128,10 +1129,9 @@ static bool maybe_fail_all_tickets(struct btrfs_space_info *space_info)
> __btrfs_dump_space_info(space_info);
> }
>
> - while (!list_empty(&space_info->tickets) &&
> - tickets_id == space_info->tickets_id) {
> - ticket = list_first_entry(&space_info->tickets,
> - struct reserve_ticket, list);
> +again:
> + while (!list_empty(head) && tickets_id == space_info->tickets_id) {
> + ticket = list_first_entry(head, struct reserve_ticket, list);
> if (unlikely(abort_error)) {
> remove_ticket(space_info, ticket, abort_error);
> } else {
> @@ -1153,6 +1153,12 @@ static bool maybe_fail_all_tickets(struct btrfs_space_info *space_info)
> btrfs_try_granting_tickets(space_info);
> }
> }
> +
> + if (head == &space_info->priority_tickets) {
> + head = &space_info->tickets;
> + goto again;
> + }
> +
> return (tickets_id != space_info->tickets_id);
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists