[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH1PCMarzrZJ072iyAQthB-i-LHFCSJ+tZLx6HcWiVcUrQeafw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:33:34 +0800
From: Guodong Xu <guodong@...cstar.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, Junhui Liu <junhui.liu@...moral.tech>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, spacemit@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: Add "b" ISA extension to existing devicetrees
Hi, Conor, Yixun
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 3:53 PM Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Guodong,
>
>
> On 15:45 Tue 13 Jan , Guodong Xu wrote:
> > "b" is ratified (Apr/2024) much later than its components zba/zbb/zbs
> > (Jun/2021). With "b" added into riscv/extensions.yaml, a dependency
> > checking rule is now enforced, which requires that when zba, zbb, and zbs
> > are all specified, "b" must be added as well. Failing to do this will
> > cause dtbs_check schema check warnings.
> >
> > According to uabi.rst, as a single-letter extension, "b" should be added
> > after "c" in canonical order.
> >
> > Update existing devicetree files to conform to this rule. Line balancing
> > is performed where needed to improve readability.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong@...cstar.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/anlogic/dr1v90.dtsi | 5 +-
> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-cpus.dtsi | 256 ++++++++++++++--------------
> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1.dtsi | 32 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-)
> please have separated patch for different SoCs, so they can go via
Understand your concern.
> their own SoC tree.. thanks
Conor, is it possible to take this as one patch instead?
It fixes the same dtbs_check warnings from riscv/extensions.yaml across three
SoCs. Keeping them together maintains readability and clear tracking, IMHO.
Happy to split if needed, but wanted to check first.
Thanks,
Guodong
>
> --
> Yixun Lan (dlan)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists