[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31e5d219-07f4-46c0-bef1-53af20d473f1@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:35:45 +0000
From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
To: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: The same symbol is printed twice when use tracepoint to get stack
On 14/01/2026 15:09, Tao Chen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> When using tracepoints to retrieve stack information, I observed that perf_trace_sched_migrate_task was printed twice. And the issue also occurs with tools using libbpf.
>
You may need the fix Jiri provided for x86_64 [1]. Eugene mentioned that
the issue persists for arm64 however [2].
Alan
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251104215405.168643-2-jolsa@kernel.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/a38fed68-67bc-98ce-8e12-743342121ae3@oracle.com/
> sudo bpftrace -e '
> tracepoint:sched:sched_migrate_task {
> printf("Task %s migrated by:\n", args->comm);
> print(kstack);
> }'
>
> Task kcompactd0 migrated by:
>
> perf_trace_sched_migrate_task+9
> perf_trace_sched_migrate_task+9
> set_task_cpu+353
> detach_task+77
> detach_tasks+281
> sched_balance_rq+452
> sched_balance_newidle+504
> pick_next_task_fair+84
> __pick_next_task+66
> pick_next_task+43
> __schedule+332
> schedule+41
> schedule_hrtimeout_range+239
> do_poll.constprop.0+668
> do_sys_poll+499
> __x64_sys_ppoll+220
> x64_sys_call+5722
> do_syscall_64+126
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+118
>
> Task jbd2/sda2-8 migrated by:
>
> perf_trace_sched_migrate_task+9
> perf_trace_sched_migrate_task+9
> set_task_cpu+353
> try_to_wake_up+365
> default_wake_function+26
> autoremove_wake_function+18
> __wake_up_common+118
> __wake_up+55
> __jbd2_log_start_commit+195
>
> env:
> bpftrace v0.21.2
> ubuntu24.04,6.14.0-36-generic
>
> The issue is as follows:
> https://github.com/bpftrace/bpftrace/issues/4949
>
>
> It seems that there is no special handling in the kernel.
> Does anyone has thoughts on this issue. Thanks.
>
> BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_raw_tp, struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args *, args,
> void *, buf, u32, size, u64, flags)
> {
> struct pt_regs *regs = get_bpf_raw_tp_regs();
> int ret;
>
> if (IS_ERR(regs))
> return PTR_ERR(regs);
>
> perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
> ret = bpf_get_stack((unsigned long) regs, (unsigned long) buf,
> (unsigned long) size, flags, 0);
> put_bpf_raw_tp_regs();
> return ret;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists