linux-kernel - Re: Mainline x86_64/arm64 defconfig+Rust `rusttest` error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72mvezjyJBgeD5Ax8fNorDpw43nYj0oHC_bagjOkpQKk_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 19:54:11 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net, a.hindborg@...nel.org, 
	bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu, 
	dakr@...nel.org, lossin@...nel.org, will@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, 
	mark.rutland@....com, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Mainline x86_64/arm64 defconfig+Rust `rusttest` error

On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 12:26 AM FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I think that simply marking the module! doctests as ignore would avoid
> the issue. But it's possible to make the atomic helpers run on the
> host side so we might want a better fix?

Applied to `rust-fixes` -- let's go with this for the moment, thanks!

    [ Only the first one is needed (the other example does not use
      parameters), so we can keep it enabled. Thus I removed that second
      deletion (and reworded a bit).

      We may want to do something better here later on; on the other hand,
      we should get KUnit tests for `macros` too eventually, so we may end
      up removing or repurposing that target anyway, so it is not a big deal.

        - Miguel ]

Cheers,
Miguel