[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260114194851.000047bc@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 19:48:51 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
CC: <dave@...olabs.net>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>, <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
<ming.li@...omail.com>, <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
<rrichter@....com>, <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
<PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com>, <lukas@...ner.de>,
<Benjamin.Cheatham@....com>, <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, <alucerop@....com>,
<ira.weiny@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 15/34] PCI/AER: Update struct aer_err_info with
kernel-doc formatting
On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 12:20:36 -0600
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com> wrote:
> Update the existing 'struct aer_err_info' definition to use kernel-doc
> formatting. Remove the inline comments to reduce noise and do not introduce
> functional changes. This will improve readability and maintainability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Hi Terry.
I didn't check but I think kernel-doc script will complain
about partial docs. Other than that possibly needing fixing with
a trivial entry for __pad1
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v13->v14:
> - New commit
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index 41ec38e82c08..dbc547db208a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -724,16 +724,33 @@ static inline bool pci_dev_binding_disallowed(struct pci_dev *dev)
>
> #define AER_MAX_MULTI_ERR_DEVICES 5 /* Not likely to have more */
>
> +/**
> + * struct aer_err_info - AER Error Information
> + * @dev: Devices reporting error
> + * @ratelimit_print: Flag to log or not log the devices' error. 0=NotLog/1=Log
> + * @error_dev_num: Number of devices reporting an error
> + * @level: printk level to use in logging
> + * @id: Value from register PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC
> + * @severity: AER severity, 0-UNCOR Non-fatal, 1-UNCOR fatal, 2-COR
> + * @root_ratelimit_print: Flag to log or not log the root's error. 0=NotLog/1=Log
The kernel-doc scripts are annoying fussy. Do they not moan about __pad1
being undocumented?
> + * @multi_error_valid: If multiple errors are reported
> + * @first_error: First reported error
> + * @is_cxl: Bus type error: 0-PCI Bus error, 1-CXL Bus error
> + * @tlp_header_valid: Indicates if TLP field contains error information
> + * @status: COR/UNCOR error status
> + * @mask: COR/UNCOR mask
> + * @tlp: Transaction packet information
> + */
> struct aer_err_info {
> struct pci_dev *dev[AER_MAX_MULTI_ERR_DEVICES];
> int ratelimit_print[AER_MAX_MULTI_ERR_DEVICES];
> int error_dev_num;
> - const char *level; /* printk level */
> + const char *level;
>
> unsigned int id:16;
>
> - unsigned int severity:2; /* 0:NONFATAL | 1:FATAL | 2:COR */
> - unsigned int root_ratelimit_print:1; /* 0=skip, 1=print */
> + unsigned int severity:2;
> + unsigned int root_ratelimit_print:1;
> unsigned int __pad1:4;
> unsigned int multi_error_valid:1;
>
> @@ -742,9 +759,9 @@ struct aer_err_info {
> unsigned int is_cxl:1;
> unsigned int tlp_header_valid:1;
>
> - unsigned int status; /* COR/UNCOR Error Status */
> - unsigned int mask; /* COR/UNCOR Error Mask */
> - struct pcie_tlp_log tlp; /* TLP Header */
> + unsigned int status;
> + unsigned int mask;
> + struct pcie_tlp_log tlp;
> };
>
> int aer_get_device_error_info(struct aer_err_info *info, int i);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists