lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89a61ef1-3e83-4303-ba04-cf5c5a4aae56@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:59:09 -0800
From: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
To: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>,
        Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanthakumar.thiagarajan@....qualcomm.com>,
        jjohnson@...nel.org, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: baochen.qiang@....qualcomm.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] wifi: ath11k: move .max_tx_ring to struct
 ath11k_hw_hal_params

On 1/14/2026 1:29 PM, Alex G. wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 14, 2026 11:24:19 AM CST Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> On 1/12/2026 11:00 PM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
>>> On 12/28/2025 8:44 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>>>> ".max_tx_ring" is an upper bounds to indexing ".tcl2wbm_rbm_map". It
>>>> is initialized in, core.c, a different file than the array. This
>>>> spaghetti-like relation is fragile and not obvious. Accidentally
>>>> setting ".max_tx_ring" too high leads to a hard to track out-of-
>>>> bounds access and memory corruption.
>>>>
>>>> There is a small ambiguity on the meaning of "max_tx_ring":
>>>>   - The highest ring, max=3 implies there are 4 rings (0, 1, 2, 3)
>>>>   - The highest number to use for array indexing (there are 3 rings)
>>>>
>>>> Clarify this dependency by moving ".max_tx_ring" adjacent to the array
>>>> ".tcl2wbm_rbm_map", and name it "num_tx_rings". Use ARRAY_SIZE()
>>>> instead of #defines to initialize the length field.
>>>>
>>>> The ath11k_hw_hal_params_qca6390 uses fewer num_tx_rings than its map,
>>>> so use a constant to express the correct value. Add a static_assert()
>>>> to fail compilation if the constant is accidentally set too high.
>>>
>>> Text related to static_assert to be removed accordingly.
>>
> Hi Jeff,
> 
>> I removed the last sentence in 'pending', please check:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ath/ath.git/commit/?h=pendin
>> g&id=26bb149b5e011b0f73f7b74421589cbd38e3304b
> 
> Re-reading the commit message, I think it makes sense to also remove the 
> sentence "The ath11k_hw_hal_params_qca6390 uses fewer num_tx_rings than its 
> map, so use a constant to express the correct value.". Do you think it's worth 
> submitting a v4 with this minor change?
> 
> Alex

No need to submit a v4. I can make that change in 'pending'

/jeff

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ