lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzYYQzeuqVF95YZobvQAU8uhmgUSLE+ov5zUds+eH5Efwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:29:47 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com, zhangxiaoqin@...omi.com, 
	ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@...omi.com>, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v12 10/11] libbpf: Optimize the performance of determine_ptr_size

On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 5:00 AM Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@...omi.com>
>
> Leverage the performance improvement of btf__find_by_name_kind() when
> BTF is sorted. For sorted BTF, the function uses binary search with
> O(log n) complexity instead of linear search, providing significant
> performance benefits, especially for large BTF like vmlinux.
>
> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
> Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
> Cc: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev>
> Cc: Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@...omi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@...omi.com>
> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 20 ++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>

This change will be beneficial only if btf is sorted, otherwise the
previous approach is generally faster. So on older kernels this will
be significantly slower.

If we want to optimize determine_ptr_size() at all, I think we will
have to take into account whether BTF is sorted or not.

Or just not bother at all with this optimization.

I'll drop this patch.


> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> index 9a864de59597..918d9fa6ec36 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -659,29 +659,21 @@ static int determine_ptr_size(const struct btf *btf)
>                 "int long unsigned",
>         };
>         const struct btf_type *t;
> -       const char *name;
> -       int i, j, n;
> +       int i, id;
>
>         if (btf->base_btf && btf->base_btf->ptr_sz > 0)
>                 return btf->base_btf->ptr_sz;
>
> -       n = btf__type_cnt(btf);
> -       for (i = 1; i < n; i++) {
> -               t = btf__type_by_id(btf, i);
> -               if (!btf_is_int(t))
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(long_aliases); i++) {
> +               id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, long_aliases[i], BTF_KIND_INT);
> +               if (id < 0)
>                         continue;
>
> +               t = btf__type_by_id(btf, id);
>                 if (t->size != 4 && t->size != 8)
>                         continue;
>
> -               name = btf__name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
> -               if (!name)
> -                       continue;
> -
> -               for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(long_aliases); j++) {
> -                       if (strcmp(name, long_aliases[j]) == 0)
> -                               return t->size;
> -               }
> +               return t->size;
>         }
>
>         return -1;
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ