linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/3] replace system_unbound_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <32088fccfccb468db893b33022f21fba@realtek.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:42:21 +0000
From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
        Johannes Berg
	<johannes@...solutions.net>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tejun Heo
	<tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker
	<frederic@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] replace system_unbound_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to
 alloc_workqueue

Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 12:19 PM Johannes Berg
> <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> > OK cool, no worries. FWIW I might have even more in wireless-next:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wireless/wireless-next.git/
> >
> > If you want to see what's pending, we have it in patchwork for wireless:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
> >
> > The ath6kl one seems to be pending still on Jeff:
> >
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20251113162032.394804-2-marco.crivellari@sus
> e.com/
> 
> Aha, nice, many thanks!
> 

The rtw88 one [1] is still queued on my hand, because it was wrongly applied [2]
causing regression and reverted by [3]. However, I have not rebased rtw-next
tree on top of wireless tree, so I can't apply [1]. Do you think this is urgent?
If so, I'd send a pull request to wireless-next right now since it is 6.19-rc5.
I don't want frequent pull-request that maintainers have extra load. 

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20251113160605.381777-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com/
[2] 9c194fe4625d ("wifi: rtw88: add WQ_UNBOUND to alloc_workqueue users")
[3] 0ff5e81e1518 ("Revert "wifi: rtw88: add WQ_UNBOUND to alloc_workqueue users"")