[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <544172e4-cdf7-4789-8cad-4dc3c498e497@gaisler.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:21:12 +0100
From: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Borislav Petkov
<bp@...en8.de>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
"David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/14] sparc/mm: replace batch->active with
is_lazy_mmu_mode_active()
On 2025-12-15 16:03, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> A per-CPU batch struct is activated when entering lazy MMU mode; its
> lifetime is the same as the lazy MMU section (it is deactivated when
> leaving the mode). Preemption is disabled in that interval to ensure
> that the per-CPU reference remains valid.
>
> The generic lazy_mmu layer now tracks whether a task is in lazy MMU
> mode. We can therefore use the generic helper
> is_lazy_mmu_mode_active() to tell whether a batch struct is active
> instead of tracking it explicitly.
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
> ---
> arch/sparc/include/asm/tlbflush_64.h | 1 -
> arch/sparc/mm/tlb.c | 9 +--------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/tlbflush_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/tlbflush_64.h
> index 4e1036728e2f..6133306ba59a 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/tlbflush_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/tlbflush_64.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ struct tlb_batch {
> unsigned int hugepage_shift;
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> unsigned long tlb_nr;
> - unsigned long active;
> unsigned long vaddrs[TLB_BATCH_NR];
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/tlb.c b/arch/sparc/mm/tlb.c
> index 7b5dfcdb1243..3a852071d260 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/tlb.c
> @@ -52,11 +52,7 @@ void flush_tlb_pending(void)
>
> void arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> {
> - struct tlb_batch *tb;
> -
> preempt_disable();
> - tb = this_cpu_ptr(&tlb_batch);
> - tb->active = 1;
> }
>
> void arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> @@ -69,10 +65,7 @@ void arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
>
> void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> {
> - struct tlb_batch *tb = this_cpu_ptr(&tlb_batch);
> -
> arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
> - tb->active = 0;
> preempt_enable();
> }
>
> @@ -93,7 +86,7 @@ static void tlb_batch_add_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr,
> nr = 0;
> }
>
> - if (!tb->active) {
> + if (!is_lazy_mmu_mode_active()) {
> flush_tsb_user_page(mm, vaddr, hugepage_shift);
> global_flush_tlb_page(mm, vaddr);
> goto out;
Acked-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>
Cheers,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists