linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <70686841-393b-47e6-b859-c2c07c273569@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:21:42 +0800
From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...ux.dev>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, hannes@...xchg.org, hughd@...gle.com,
 roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, muchun.song@...ux.dev, david@...nel.org,
 lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, ziy@...dia.com, harry.yoo@...cle.com,
 imran.f.khan@...cle.com, kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com,
 axelrasmussen@...gle.com, yuanchu@...gle.com, weixugc@...gle.com,
 chenridong@...weicloud.com, mkoutny@...e.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com, apais@...ux.microsoft.com,
 lance.yang@...ux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup



On 1/14/26 2:02 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> Hi Qi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 10:34:08AM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> On 1/12/26 10:21 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> I can see that Johannes, Shakeel and others have done a review and also
>>> suggested some minor improvements/modifications. Are you planning to
>>
>> Yes. I'm working on them (mainly non-hierarchical stats issue reported
>> by Yosry Ahmed).
>>
>>> consolidate those and repost anytime soon?
>>
>> I'm testing it locally and will try to release v3 this week.
> 
> Please take a look at the AI review posted by Roman. IMO it does have very
> interesting comments, so at least go through them and check if those

To be honest, until an official AI bot is developed, I don't want to see
any raw AI comment results unless the sender has already reviewd them.

> makes sense. Please point out if something doesn't make sense which we
> help us to further improve the AI review process.

That makes sense, the v3 fixed some issues, so let Roman scan it again
with the AI bot based on v3.

Thanks,
Qi

> 
> thanks,
> Shakeel