[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWdRVY6Bzw2kjedk@tiehlicka>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:18:29 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Martin Liu <liumartin@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, christian.koenig@....com,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@...miny.me>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <liam.howlett@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mm: Fix OOM killer and proc stats inaccuracy on
large many-core systems
On Tue 13-01-26 20:22:16, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> On 2026-01-13 18:55, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 17:16:16 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The hpcc series introduces an approximation which provides accuracy
> > > limits on the approximation that make the result is still somewhat
> > > meaninful on large many core systems.
> >
> > Can we leave the non-oom related parts of procfs as-is for now, then
> > migrate them over to hpcc when that is available? Safer that way.
>
> Of course.
>
> So AFAIU the plan is:
>
> 1) update the oom accuracy fix to only use the precise sum for
> the oom killer, no changes to procfs ABIs. This targets mm-new.
>
> 2) update the hpcc series to base them on top of the new fix from (1).
> Update their commit messages to indicate that they bring accuracy
> improvements to the procfs ABI on large many-core systems, as well as
> latency improvements to the oom killer. This will target upstreaming
> after the next merge window, but I will still post it soon to gather
> feedback.
>
> Does that plan look OK ?
I was about to propose the same. 1) is a regression fix and should be
merged first and go to stable trees (it is a low priority fix but still
worth having addressed).
Also a minor nit. You do not have to send cover letter for a single
patch series.
Thanks for working on this Mathieu!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists