linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] nvmem: qcom-spmi-sdam: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aWdk-RP-59cJeCBo@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:42:17 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com,
	andy@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	srini@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
	sre@...nel.org, sboyd@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org,
	dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com, quic_wcheng@...cinc.com,
	melody.olvera@....qualcomm.com, quic_nsekar@...cinc.com,
	ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com, abelvesa@...nel.org,
	luca.weiss@...rphone.com, konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com,
	mitltlatltl@...il.com, krishna.kurapati@....qualcomm.com,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] nvmem: qcom-spmi-sdam: Migrate to
 devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()

On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 10:09:45AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 14/01/26 10:07, Andy Shevchenko ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 10:03:57AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > > Il 14/01/26 10:00, Andy Shevchenko ha scritto:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 09:59:40AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > > > > Il 14/01/26 09:56, Andy Shevchenko ha scritto:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 09:39:52AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:

...

> > > > > > > +	struct regmap_config sdam_regmap_config = {
> > > > > > > +		.reg_bits = 16,
> > > > > > > +		.val_bits = 8,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > +		.max_register = 0x100,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Are you sure? This might be a bad naming, but here max == the last accessible.
> > > > > > I bet it has to be 0xff (but since the address is 16-bit it might be actually
> > > > > > 257 registers, but sounds very weird).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, I'm sure.
> > > > 
> > > > So, what is resided on address 0x100 ?
> > > 
> > > I don't remember, this is research from around 5 months ago, when I've sent
> > > the v1 of this.
> > > 
> > > If you really want though, I can incorrectly set max_register to 0xff.
> > 
> > Why incorrectly? Can you dig into the datasheet and check, please? We don't
> > know what is the 0x100 address means.
> 
> I don't have any datasheets for Qualcomm IPs.

Hmm... Can we have somebody from QC to check on this?
Perhaps Dmitry?

> > > > > > > +		.fast_io = true,
> > > > > > > +	};

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko