[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260113173533.171248b2f6c11c536e4fc65a@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 17:35:33 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo
<tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Martin Liu
<liumartin@...gle.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
christian.koenig@....com, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, SeongJae
Park <sj@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Johannes Weiner
<hannes@...xchg.org>, Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@...miny.me>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, "Liam R . Howlett"
<liam.howlett@...cle.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Suren
Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Wei Yang
<richard.weiyang@...il.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Miaohe
Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Roman
Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mm: Fix OOM killer and proc stats inaccuracy on
large many-core systems
On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 20:22:16 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> On 2026-01-13 18:55, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 17:16:16 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The hpcc series introduces an approximation which provides accuracy
> >> limits on the approximation that make the result is still somewhat
> >> meaninful on large many core systems.
> >
> > Can we leave the non-oom related parts of procfs as-is for now, then
> > migrate them over to hpcc when that is available? Safer that way.
>
> Of course.
>
> So AFAIU the plan is:
>
> 1) update the oom accuracy fix to only use the precise sum for
> the oom killer, no changes to procfs ABIs. This targets mm-new.
>
> 2) update the hpcc series to base them on top of the new fix from (1).
> Update their commit messages to indicate that they bring accuracy
> improvements to the procfs ABI on large many-core systems, as well as
> latency improvements to the oom killer. This will target upstreaming
> after the next merge window, but I will still post it soon to gather
> feedback.
>
> Does that plan look OK ?
Perfect, thanks. Except there is no "(1)". We shall survive ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists