[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWjYHK1cTj8Dbz2B@vaman>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:35:48 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Jiayu Du <jiayu.riscv@...c.iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: conor@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
pjw@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
alex@...ti.fr, 18771902331@....com, cyy@...self.name,
TroyMitchell988@...il.com, kingxukai@...omail.com,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, gaohan@...as.ac.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] phy: usb: Add driver for Canaan K230 USB 2.0 PHY
On 15-01-26, 14:42, Jiayu Du wrote:
> +static struct phy *k230_usb_phy_xlate(struct device *dev,
> + const struct of_phandle_args *args)
> +{
> + struct k230_usb_phy_global *global = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct k230_usb_phy_instance *phy_inst;
> + struct phy *phy;
> +
> + if (args->args[0] >= MAX_PHYS)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + phy_inst = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*phy_inst), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!phy_inst)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + phy_inst->global = global;
> + phy_inst->index = args->args[0];
> +
> + phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &k230_usb_phy_ops);
> + if (IS_ERR(phy))
> + return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(phy));
> +
> + phy_set_drvdata(phy, phy_inst);
This seems wrong place, why is this not done in the driver probe?
> +
> + return phy;
> +}
> +
> +static int k230_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct k230_usb_phy_global *global;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct phy_provider *provider;
> +
> + global = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*global), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!global)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, global);
> +
> + global->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(global->base))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(global->base),
> + "ioremap failed\n");
> +
> + global->reg_test_offset[0] = 0x70;
> + global->reg_ctl_offset[0] = 0xb0;
> + global->reg_test_offset[1] = 0x90;
> + global->reg_ctl_offset[1] = 0xb8;
Where are these magic values coming from?
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists