lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <417b4ba4-c0a5-1250-8099-e18142fe61ff@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:09:49 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
cc: thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, 
    irenic.rajneesh@...il.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, 
    intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
    xi.pardee@...ux.intel.comn, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>, 
    LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Return real error codes
 from registration path

On Tue, 6 Jan 2026, David E. Box wrote:

> Stop collapsing registration results into booleans. Make
> intel_vsec_walk_header() return int and propagate the first non-zero error
> from intel_vsec_register_device(). intel_vsec_register() now returns that
> error directly and 0 on success.
> 
> This preserves success behavior while surfacing meaningful errors instead
> of hiding them behind a bool/-ENODEV, which makes debugging and probe
> ordering issues clearer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c | 16 ++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c
> index b84bb92624ef..42471fd609b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c
> @@ -461,20 +461,19 @@ static int intel_vsec_register_device(struct device *dev,
>  	return -EAGAIN;
>  }
>  
> -static bool intel_vsec_walk_header(struct device *dev,
> -				   struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info)
> +static int intel_vsec_walk_header(struct device *dev,
> +				  struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info)
>  {
>  	struct intel_vsec_header **header = info->headers;
> -	bool have_devices = false;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	for ( ; *header; header++) {
>  		ret = intel_vsec_register_device(dev, *header, info);
> -		if (!ret)
> -			have_devices = true;
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	return have_devices;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static bool intel_vsec_walk_dvsec(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> @@ -582,10 +581,7 @@ int intel_vsec_register(struct device *dev,
>  	if (!dev || !info || !info->headers)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (!intel_vsec_walk_header(dev, info))
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +	return intel_vsec_walk_header(dev, info);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_vsec_register, "INTEL_VSEC");
>  
> 

Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
 i.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ