[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1199975e-cfd8-4a97-b7c6-0e0b9e7abef2@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 13:35:18 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt5640: Fix duplicate clock properties in DT
binding
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 02:31:41PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 01:05:17PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > [1/1] ASoC: rt5640: Fix duplicate clock properties in DT binding
> > commit: be5a39e7994ec9f003c8569b670c794a4e5d1551
> Note, in the repository the change has duplicate SoB tag. IIRC Linux Next validation
> complains (used to complain?) about inconsistencies or this kind of issues with tags.
I'll be sure to tell me if it turns out to be a problem :)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists