[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260115150904-39b7e692-4bf5-497e-865c-c8d71a097e82@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:11:16 +0100
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: vDSO: getrandom: Fix path to s390 chacha
implementation
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 03:05:57PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 02:56:52PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > The s390 vDSO source directory was recently moved,
> > but this reference was not updated.
> >
> > Fixes: c0087d807ae8 ("s390/vdso: Rename vdso64 to vdso")
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vgetrandom-chacha.S | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Should this go via s390 or will you take it?
You can take it via s390.
The test framework I am using lives in a custom branch anyways, so I'll
can carry the patch for myself. And nobody else seems to run these tests.
> In any case:
> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists