[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51761d10-2ad4-4c5c-8bb1-5463d42aa31e@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:47:50 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 12/20] slab: remove defer_deactivate_slab()
On 1/15/26 15:09, Hao Li wrote:
>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -3248,7 +3248,7 @@ static struct slab *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
>> flags & (GFP_RECLAIM_MASK | GFP_CONSTRAINT_MASK), node);
>> }
>>
>> -static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
>> +static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, bool allow_spin)
>> {
>> struct page *page = slab_page(slab);
>> int order = compound_order(page);
>> @@ -3262,11 +3262,20 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
>> free_frozen_pages(page, order);
>
> Here we missed using the newly added allow_spin.
> It should call free_frozen_pages_nolock() when !allow_spin.
Uh damn, the first RFC had it correct. Where did I screw up with git? Sigh.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists