[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ztriduhwhimeztfdgijai2qeii2giaosb6qizhj4skxg6k5uq4@bi6vomgv3whj>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:42:54 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/msm/dp: Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 09:29:10AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> From: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>
>
> Currently, we queue an event for signalling HPD connect/disconnect. This
> can mean a delay in plug/unplug handling and notifying DRM core when a
> hotplug happens.
>
> Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION and signal the IRQ event as part of hotplug
> handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> index 3184066adb15..e0b424ac861a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ enum {
> EV_HPD_PLUG_INT,
> EV_IRQ_HPD_INT,
> EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT,
> - EV_USER_NOTIFICATION,
> };
>
> #define EVENT_TIMEOUT (HZ/10) /* 100ms */
> @@ -343,17 +342,6 @@ static const struct component_ops msm_dp_display_comp_ops = {
> .unbind = msm_dp_display_unbind,
> };
>
> -static void msm_dp_display_send_hpd_event(struct msm_dp *msm_dp_display)
> -{
> - struct msm_dp_display_private *dp;
> - struct drm_connector *connector;
> -
> - dp = container_of(msm_dp_display, struct msm_dp_display_private, msm_dp_display);
> -
> - connector = dp->msm_dp_display.connector;
> - drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(connector->dev);
> -}
> -
> static int msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp,
> bool hpd)
> {
> @@ -377,7 +365,11 @@ static int msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(struct msm_dp_display_private *d
>
> drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "type=%d hpd=%d\n",
> dp->msm_dp_display.connector_type, hpd);
> - msm_dp_display_send_hpd_event(&dp->msm_dp_display);
> +
> + drm_bridge_hpd_notify(dp->msm_dp_display.bridge,
> + hpd ?
> + connector_status_connected :
> + connector_status_disconnected);
Last time we tried this, we where out of sync with the link_ready in
detect. So, I'm still wondering about that if (!link_ready) return
disconnected; in the detect function.
With a reliable detect method, this looks good though.
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Regards,
Bjorn
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -437,7 +429,7 @@ static int msm_dp_display_process_hpd_high(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
>
> msm_dp_link_reset_phy_params_vx_px(dp->link);
>
> - msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, true, 0);
> + msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(dp, true);
>
> end:
> return rc;
> @@ -506,7 +498,7 @@ static int msm_dp_display_notify_disconnect(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct msm_dp_display_private *dp = dev_get_dp_display_private(dev);
>
> - msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, false, 0);
> + msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(dp, false);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -527,7 +519,7 @@ static int msm_dp_display_handle_port_status_changed(struct msm_dp_display_priva
> drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "sink count is zero, nothing to do\n");
> if (dp->hpd_state != ST_DISCONNECTED) {
> dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING;
> - msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, false, 0);
> + msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(dp, false);
> }
> } else {
> if (dp->hpd_state == ST_DISCONNECTED) {
> @@ -1121,10 +1113,6 @@ static int hpd_event_thread(void *data)
> case EV_IRQ_HPD_INT:
> msm_dp_irq_hpd_handle(msm_dp_priv, todo->data);
> break;
> - case EV_USER_NOTIFICATION:
> - msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(msm_dp_priv,
> - todo->data);
> - break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
> index cc6e2cab36e9..60094061c102 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct msm_dp {
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> struct drm_connector *connector;
> struct drm_bridge *next_bridge;
> + struct drm_bridge *bridge;
> bool link_ready;
> bool audio_enabled;
> bool power_on;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> index e4622c85fb66..f935093c4df4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> @@ -340,6 +340,8 @@ int msm_dp_bridge_init(struct msm_dp *msm_dp_display, struct drm_device *dev,
> }
> }
>
> + msm_dp_display->bridge = bridge;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists