linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH v6 0/6] OpenRISC de0 nano single and multicore boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <176849165027.29734.708711779514578942.b4-ty@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:40:53 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>,
        Linux OpenRISC <linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v6 0/6] OpenRISC de0 nano single and multicore boards


On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:09:56 +0000, Stafford Horne wrote:
> Since v5:
>  - Adjust dt-binding patch based on suggestions from Geert and Krzysztof.
>  - Add reviewed-by's on the dt-binding patch.
> Since v4:
>  - Rebased the series on linux-next to allow patches to be incremental.
>  - Rewrote the dt-bindings patch as an incremental patch, Due to this I
>    dropped reviewed-by's.
>  - Added acked-by to the IPI fix patch.
> Since v3:
>  - Switch order of gpio-mmio driver and bindings patches to patch binding
>    first before driver.  Suggested by Krzysztof.
>  - Removed example form binding suggested by Krzysztof.
>  - Added Reviewed-by's from Geert and Linus W.
> Since v2:
>  - Fixup (replace) gpio-mmio patch to update driver compatible list and just add
>    opencores,gpio to mmio-gpio bindings.  Discussed with Geert and Linus W
>    because the 8-bit opencores,gpio is not the same as the 32-bit broadcom
>    chip. [1].
>  - Update new device trees to use proper ordering, remove debug options, remove
>    unneeded "status" properties.  Suggested by Geert.
> Since v1:
>  - Use proper schema in gpio-mmio suggsted by Conor Dooley
>  - Remove 0 clock-frequency definitions in dtsi file
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/6] dt-bindings: gpio-mmio: Correct opencores GPIO
      commit: b2b8d247ad8ee1abe860598cae70e2dbe8a09128
[2/6] gpio: mmio: Add compatible for opencores GPIO
      commit: 3a6a36a3fc4e18e202eaf6c258553b5a17b91677

Best regards,
-- 
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>