[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf788cfe-ac2e-4ffc-9349-64d9c36bf072@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:48:20 +0100
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
To: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>, Frank van der Linden <fvdl@...gle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
kernel-team@...a.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 02/15] mm: Move MAX_FOLIO_ORDER definition to mmzone.h
On 1/15/26 17:35, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
> On 1/15/26 15:45, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
>> Move MAX_FOLIO_ORDER definition from mm.h to mmzone.h.
>
> Why should that belong to mmzone.h ? Semantically doesn't make sense, no?
To clarify, I would have moved it to something more folio-type specific,
not something buddy/zone specific.
I guess page-flags.h + mm.h are our dumping ground for folio handling. I
would have moved it to the former.
Likely we want some folio.h in some distant future.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@...nel.org>
--
Cheers
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists