lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <i2cjyphx5olz4l25pdbt2yso7ryoc4usbnl27ovrou3ih6rptl@prp5lhv56bt7>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 20:50:51 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
        Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] drm/msm/dp: Move link training to atomic_enable()

On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 09:39:29AM -0600, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 10:30:49AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > On 1/15/26 8:29 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > From: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>
> > > 
> > > Currently, the DP link training is being done during HPD. Move
> > > link training to atomic_enable() in accordance with the atomic_enable()
> > > documentation.
> > > 
> > > Link disabling is already done in atomic_post_disable() (as part of the
> > > dp_ctrl_off_link_stream() helper).
> > > 
> > > Finally, call the plug/unplug handlers directly in hpd_notify() instead
> > > of queueing them in the event thread so that they aren't preempted by
> > > other events.
> > 
> > I think this part of the commit message no longer applies 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 11 ++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > > index a05144de3b93..3184066adb15 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > > @@ -436,11 +436,6 @@ static int msm_dp_display_process_hpd_high(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
> > >  	msm_dp_link_psm_config(dp->link, &dp->panel->link_info, false);
> > >  
> > >  	msm_dp_link_reset_phy_params_vx_px(dp->link);
> > > -	rc = msm_dp_ctrl_on_link(dp->ctrl);
> > > -	if (rc) {
> > > -		DRM_ERROR("failed to complete DP link training\n");
> > > -		goto end;
> > > -	}
> > >  
> > >  	msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, true, 0);
> > >  
> > > @@ -1695,6 +1690,12 @@ void msm_dp_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> > >  		force_link_train = true;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > +	rc = msm_dp_ctrl_on_link(msm_dp_display->ctrl);
> > > +	if (rc) {
> > > +		DRM_ERROR("Failed link training (rc=%d)\n", rc);
> > > +		drm_connector_set_link_status_property(dp->connector, DRM_LINK_STATUS_BAD);
> > > +	}
> > 
> > Previously failure in this call would have propagated an error
> > 
> > msm_dp_ctrl_on_link() enables mainlink clocks, so 
> > 
> 
> Missed that one. I guess in practice it's not much difference from the
> previous behavior - where the display just wouldn't work either, except
> for the crash you point out below.
> 
> It seems to be that it would make sense to return an error to userspace
> when this happens, but the kernel-doc says:
> 
> """
> The bridge can assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
> signals) feeding it is running when this callback is called.
> """
> 
> What's the expected error path here?

None. The only thing we can do in atomic paths is to set the bad
link_status and be ready not to crash (especially at the disable()
path).

> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 
> > > +
> > >  	msm_dp_display_enable(msm_dp_display, force_link_train);
> > 
> > IIUC this will crash the machine if the above fails
> > 
> > Konrad
> > 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ