[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176849899358.719951.4865343558456057809.b4-ty@google.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 10:03:26 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, pbonzini@...hat.com, Jun Miao <jun.miao@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: align the code with kvm_x86_call()
On Mon, 05 Jan 2026 14:54:23 +0800, Jun Miao wrote:
> The use of static_call_cond() is essentially the same as static_call() on
> x86 (e.g. static_call() now handles a NULL pointer as a NOP), and then the
> kvm_x86_call() is added to improve code readability and maintainability
> for keeping consistent code style.
>
> Fixes 8d032b683c29 ("KVM: TDX: create/destroy VM structure")
>
> [...]
Applied to kvm-x86 misc, thanks!
[1/1] KVM: x86: align the code with kvm_x86_call()
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/de0dc71188ca
--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists