[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWiLFFnk9aAiMMJI@duge-virtual-machine>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:38:14 +0800
From: Jiayu Du <jiayu.riscv@...c.iscas.ac.cn>
To: linusw@...nel.org
Cc: pjw@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
alex@...ti.fr, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gaohan@...as.ac.cn, me@...ao.cc
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: canaan: k230: Fix NULL pointer dereference
when parsing devicetree
On Sun, Dec 28, 2025 at 11:49:47PM +0800, Jiayu Du wrote:
> When probing the k230 pinctrl driver, the kernel triggers a NULL pointer
> dereference. The crash trace showed:
> [ 0.732084] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000068
> [ 0.740737] ...
> [ 0.776296] epc : k230_pinctrl_probe+0x1be/0x4fc
>
> In k230_pinctrl_parse_functions(), we attempt to retrieve the device
> pointer via info->pctl_dev->dev, but info->pctl_dev is only initialized
> after k230_pinctrl_parse_dt() completes.
>
> At the time of DT parsing, info->pctl_dev is still NULL, leading to
> the invalid dereference of info->pctl_dev->dev.
>
> Use the already available device pointer from platform_device
> instead of accessing through uninitialized pctl_dev.
>
> Fixes: d94a32ac688f ("pinctrl: canaan: k230: Fix order of DT parse and pinctrl register")
> Signed-off-by: Jiayu Du <jiayu.riscv@...c.iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k230.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k230.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k230.c
> index d716f23d837f..20f7c0f70eb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k230.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k230.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct k230_pmx_func {
> };
>
> struct k230_pinctrl {
> + struct device *dev;
> struct pinctrl_desc pctl;
> struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev;
> struct regmap *regmap_base;
> @@ -470,7 +471,7 @@ static int k230_pinctrl_parse_groups(struct device_node *np,
> struct k230_pinctrl *info,
> unsigned int index)
> {
> - struct device *dev = info->pctl_dev->dev;
> + struct device *dev = info->dev;
> const __be32 *list;
> int size, i, ret;
>
> @@ -511,7 +512,7 @@ static int k230_pinctrl_parse_functions(struct device_node *np,
> struct k230_pinctrl *info,
> unsigned int index)
> {
> - struct device *dev = info->pctl_dev->dev;
> + struct device *dev = info->dev;
> struct k230_pmx_func *func;
> struct k230_pin_group *grp;
> static unsigned int idx, i;
> @@ -596,6 +597,8 @@ static int k230_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!info)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + info->dev = dev;
> +
> pctl = &info->pctl;
>
> pctl->name = "k230-pinctrl";
> --
> 2.52.0
>
Hi Linus, could you please take a look at this patch? Thanks for
your time.
Regards,
Jiayu Du
Powered by blists - more mailing lists