[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260115-pci-pwrctrl-rework-v5-2-9d26da3ce903@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 12:58:54 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay <devnull+manivannan.sadhasivam.oss.qualcomm.com@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 02/15] PCI/pwrctrl: slot: Rename private struct and
pointers for consistency
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Previously the pwrseq, tc9563, and slot pwrctrl drivers used different
naming conventions for their private data structs and pointers to them,
which makes patches hard to read:
Previous names New names
------------------------------------ ----------------------------------
struct pci_pwrctrl_pwrseq_data { struct pci_pwrctrl_pwrseq {
struct pci_pwrctrl ctx; struct pci_pwrctrl pwrctrl;
struct pci_pwrctrl_pwrseq_data *data struct pci_pwrctrl_pwrseq *pwrseq
struct tc9563_pwrctrl_ctx { struct pci_pwrctrl_tc9563 {
struct tc9563_pwrctrl_ctx *ctx struct pci_pwrctrl_tc9563 *tc9563
struct pci_pwrctrl_slot_data { struct pci_pwrctrl_slot {
struct pci_pwrctrl ctx; struct pci_pwrctrl pwrctrl;
struct pci_pwrctrl_slot_data *slot struct pci_pwrctrl_slot *slot
Rename "struct pci_pwrctrl_slot_data" to "struct pci_pwrctrl_slot".
Rename the "struct pci_pwrctrl ctx" member to "struct pci_pwrctrl pwrctrl".
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/pci/pwrctrl/slot.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pwrctrl/slot.c b/drivers/pci/pwrctrl/slot.c
index 3320494b62d8..5ddae4ae3431 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pwrctrl/slot.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pwrctrl/slot.c
@@ -13,15 +13,15 @@
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-struct pci_pwrctrl_slot_data {
- struct pci_pwrctrl ctx;
+struct pci_pwrctrl_slot {
+ struct pci_pwrctrl pwrctrl;
struct regulator_bulk_data *supplies;
int num_supplies;
};
static void devm_pci_pwrctrl_slot_power_off(void *data)
{
- struct pci_pwrctrl_slot_data *slot = data;
+ struct pci_pwrctrl_slot *slot = data;
regulator_bulk_disable(slot->num_supplies, slot->supplies);
regulator_bulk_free(slot->num_supplies, slot->supplies);
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static void devm_pci_pwrctrl_slot_power_off(void *data)
static int pci_pwrctrl_slot_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct pci_pwrctrl_slot_data *slot;
+ struct pci_pwrctrl_slot *slot;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct clk *clk;
int ret;
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ static int pci_pwrctrl_slot_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
"Failed to enable slot clock\n");
}
- pci_pwrctrl_init(&slot->ctx, dev);
+ pci_pwrctrl_init(&slot->pwrctrl, dev);
- ret = devm_pci_pwrctrl_device_set_ready(dev, &slot->ctx);
+ ret = devm_pci_pwrctrl_device_set_ready(dev, &slot->pwrctrl);
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register pwrctrl driver\n");
--
2.48.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists