[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWihLru9aT75LCPm@gaggiata.pivistrello.it>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:11:26 +0100
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, kwilczynski@...nel.org,
mani@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, hongxing.zhu@....com,
frank.li@....com, l.stach@...gutronix.de, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fsl,imx6q-pcie: Remove the deprecated
"reset-gpio-active-high" property
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 10:08:47AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 08:34:18AM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 03:18:13PM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > And , the property is still handled, see commit b8b80348c57b
> > ("gpiolib: of: add polarity quirk for Freescale PCIe controller"), the
> > DT compatibility was not broken as you seem to imply in this series.
>
> This is a quirk and not a 1st class support. There must be no such property
> in new DTs, it's only present for the backward compatibility.
>
> For the old ones, indeed the property is needed.
Ack, we just agree here.
Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists