linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: axis-fifo: Use bulk I/O accessors for data transfers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2026011527-poking-comrade-2e43@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 12:30:02 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Minu Jin <s9430939@...er.com>
Cc: ovidiu.panait.oss@...il.com, gshahrouzi@...il.com,
	linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: axis-fifo: Use bulk I/O accessors for
 data transfers

On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 11:25:09AM +0900, Minu Jin wrote:
> Replace manual for loops with ioread32_rep/iowrite32_rep.
> Add axis_fifo_read_data() and axis_fifo_write_data() wrappers to
> encapsulate these block-transfer operations.
> 
> No functional changes intended
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>

The test robot reported that this needs to be replaced?  Or did it just
report a problem in your previous submission?  If the latter, then
there's no need to add that here as that really doesn't make sense.

thanks,

greg k-h