linux-kernel - Forwarded: [PATCH] netrom: fix memory leak in nr_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6969a024.050a0220.58bed.0036.GAE@google.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:19:16 -0800
From: syzbot <syzbot+3f2d46b6e62b8dd546d3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Forwarded: [PATCH] netrom: fix memory leak in nr_add_node()

For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com.

***

Subject: [PATCH] netrom: fix memory leak in nr_add_node()
Author: kartikey406@...il.com

#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master

When nr_add_node() creates a new neighbor but the route quality is too
low to be added (node already has 3 routes with better quality), the
newly allocated neighbor is never used but remains in the neighbor list
with refcount=1, causing a memory leak.

Fix by checking if the new neighbor was actually used (count > 0) and
removing it from the list if not.

Reported-by: syzbot+3f2d46b6e62b8dd546d3@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>
---
 net/netrom/nr_route.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
index b94cb2ffbaf8..4b85bacb7f65 100644
--- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c
+++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
 {
 	struct nr_node  *nr_node;
 	struct nr_neigh *nr_neigh;
+	bool new_neigh = false;
 	int i, found;
 	struct net_device *odev;
 
@@ -172,6 +173,7 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
 			}
 		}
 
+		new_neigh = true;
 		spin_lock_bh(&nr_neigh_list_lock);
 		hlist_add_head(&nr_neigh->neigh_node, &nr_neigh_list);
 		nr_neigh_hold(nr_neigh);
@@ -279,6 +281,9 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (new_neigh && nr_neigh->count == 0)
+		nr_remove_neigh(nr_neigh);
+
 	nr_neigh_put(nr_neigh);
 	nr_node_unlock(nr_node);
 	nr_node_put(nr_node);
-- 
2.43.0