linux-kernel - Re: firmware: arm_scpi: Fix a reference leak on device node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9438c328-c5be-42c3-b7b0-17dae62fac98@web.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 17:13:01 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Felix Gu <gu_0233@...com>, Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: firmware: arm_scpi: Fix a reference leak on device node

>> …
>>> In scpi_dev_domain_id, it does not release the reference.
>>
>> See also once more:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.19-rc5#n94
>>
> 
> This is useless

Do you really disagree here to the usage of imperative mood in change descriptions?


> and looks like coming from the bot.

I hope that views can become more constructive again.


> Note to the author:
> ignore this and no need to act on this.

Will other contributors get more positive attention for recurring patch review concerns?

Regards,
Markus