[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260116162652.176054-1-baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 00:26:52 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc: Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
baohua@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com,
david@...nel.org,
dev.jain@....com,
harry.yoo@...cle.com,
jannh@...gle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
mhocko@...e.com,
riel@...riel.com,
rppt@...nel.org,
ryan.roberts@....com,
surenb@...gle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz,
will@...nel.org,
willy@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: rmap: skip batched unmapping for UFFD vmas
As Dev reported[1], it's not ready to support batched unmapping for uffd case.
Let's still fallback to per-page unmapping for the uffd case.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260116082721.275178-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
Reported-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
Suggested-by: Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
mm/rmap.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index f13480cb9f2e..172643092dcf 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1953,6 +1953,9 @@ static inline unsigned int folio_unmap_pte_batch(struct folio *folio,
if (pte_unused(pte))
return 1;
+ if (userfaultfd_wp(vma))
+ return 1;
+
return folio_pte_batch(folio, pvmw->pte, pte, max_nr);
}
--
2.47.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists