linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] ASoC: sophgo: add CV1800 AIAO mux and I2S support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aWpyLQ6FR8_RsD1n@anton.local>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:25:51 +0400
From: "Anton D. Stavinskii" <stavinsky@...il.com>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, 
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>, 
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, 
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ASoC: sophgo: add CV1800 AIAO mux and I2S support

> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 11:17:37PM +0400, Anton D. Stavinskii wrote:
> > This patch series adds basic audio support for Sophgo CV1800B, 
> > as used on boards such as the Milk-V Duo. 
> > The series introduces an AIAO audio mux driver, 
> > an I2S controller driver, corresponding DT bindings, 
> > and DTS updates to wire the components together.
> > 
> 
> I haven't see your mux driver, is it missed?

That was bad copy paste from original version. 
Thanks for noticing this. Will update the cover letter.
I want to not overcomplicate already big patch series.
So multiplexing will be done later. 
> 

> Thanks for your patch, for all the patchs, I hope you write a
> meaningful comment for the patch, at least for now I found it
> is nothing in your comment.

Thank you for a great help with that series. Do you mean
I need to add more meaningful comments for each commit or the 
cover letter is not describing everything clear enough? 
Anyway will do my best in the second version. 
> 
> Also, the patch 8 should not in this patch and should be a
> separate patch.

Yes I've missed this thing. I will remove the last commit 
and move codecs nodes to the base dtsi file.