[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260116174947.GA1134434@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 13:49:47 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@...el.com>
Cc: intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
adhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@...nel.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Balbir Singh <balbirs@...dia.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] mm/zone_device: Reinitialize large zone device
private folios
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 12:10:16PM +0100, Francois Dugast wrote:
> -void zone_device_page_init(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> +void zone_device_page_init(struct page *page, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap,
> + unsigned int order)
> {
> + struct page *new_page = page;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(order > MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
>
> + for (i = 0; i < (1UL << order); ++i, ++new_page) {
> + struct folio *new_folio = (struct folio *)new_page;
> +
> + /*
> + * new_page could have been part of previous higher order folio
> + * which encodes the order, in page + 1, in the flags bits. We
> + * blindly clear bits which could have set my order field here,
> + * including page head.
> + */
> + new_page->flags.f &= ~0xffUL; /* Clear possible order, page head */
> +
> +#ifdef NR_PAGES_IN_LARGE_FOLIO
> + /*
> + * This pointer math looks odd, but new_page could have been
> + * part of a previous higher order folio, which sets _nr_pages
> + * in page + 1 (new_page). Therefore, we use pointer casting to
> + * correctly locate the _nr_pages bits within new_page which
> + * could have modified by previous higher order folio.
> + */
> + ((struct folio *)(new_page - 1))->_nr_pages = 0;
> +#endif
This seems too weird, why is it in the loop? There is only one
_nr_pages per folio.
This is mostly zeroing some memory in the tail pages? Why?
Why can't this use the normal helpers, like memmap_init_compound()?
struct folio *new_folio = page
/* First 4 tail pages are part of struct folio */
for (i = 4; i < (1UL << order); i++) {
prep_compound_tail(..)
}
prep_comound_head(page, order)
new_folio->_nr_pages = 0
??
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists