[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260116-transparent-dexterous-nightingale-c029cb@quoll>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 09:46:54 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, akhilpo@....qualcomm.com, vikash.garodia@....qualcomm.com,
dikshita.agarwal@....qualcomm.com, robin.clark@....qualcomm.com, lumag@...nel.org,
loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com, jorge.ramirez@....qualcomm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: msm: qcm2290-mdss: Fix
iommus property
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 11:50:02AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@....qualcomm.com>
>
> Fix IOMMU DT propety for display via dropping SMMU stream IDs which
> relates to secure context bank. Assigning Linux kernel (HLOS) VMID
> to secure context bank stream IDs is incorrect.
>
> The min value is added for iommus property to ensure in future when
> secure context bank stream IDs are properly supported then the iommus
> property is extensible.
>
> These DT bindings changes should be backwards compatible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,qcm2290-mdss.yaml | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,qcm2290-mdss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,qcm2290-mdss.yaml
> index f0cdb5422688..5c888f07bc0b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,qcm2290-mdss.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,qcm2290-mdss.yaml
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ properties:
> - const: core
>
> iommus:
> + minItems: 1
Same comment as other changes like that, which I already gave guideline
- you need to list the items (minItems stay), because you now claim the
order matters and is strictly defined.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists