[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF4D4jAdTK6ZttOE7nSXbDqyGefYRsroNtS-7yoPRE5EEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 09:54:50 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Dan Scally <dan.scally@...asonboard.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: platform: Add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 10:20 PM Dan Scally <dan.scally@...asonboard.com> wrote:
> [...]
> Sorry for the delay getting back to you. I haven't looked at the impact of the refactoring in
> detail, but I'm happy to trust you on the workqueue internals and this is line with the changes to
> other drivers across the tree so:
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@...asonboard.com>
Hi Daniel,
No worries, thanks for your reply and the Ack!
BTW, the introduction of WQ_PERCPU here it's only to keep the same old
behavior, but make explicit it is per-cpu and not unbound.
Looking at the code there is a big chance this can already be
converted to unbound anyhow,
(WQ_UNBOUND, explicitly) because I don't see per-cpu variables around.
Otherwise this can
be done in a later step, and keep the per-cpu behavior for now, like
it has been till now.
Thanks!
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists