[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260116104127.GA1890602@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 11:41:27 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: tip-bot2 for Oleg Nesterov <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Paulo Andrade <pandrade@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: perf/core] x86/uprobes: Fix XOL allocation failure for
32-bit tasks
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 11:00:23AM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/15, tip-bot2 for Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:
>
> Damn!
>
> thanks Peter, but...
>
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> > @@ -1823,3 +1823,27 @@ bool is_uprobe_at_func_entry(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >
> > return false;
> > }
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
> > +unsigned long __weak arch_uprobe_get_xol_area(void)
>
> Oh, but x86 version should not be __weak. Copy-and-paste error, sorry :/
>
> What do you want me to do now,
>
> - send V2 ?
>
> - send another s/__weak// patch on top of this hack?
>
> - or perhaps you can fix this yourself?
I'll have to rebase anyway, might as well fix it directly.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists