[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f2188ad4346e31a679fb6a082c9d32fb@mainlining.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 11:51:10 +0100
From: barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Gabriel Gonzales
<semfault@...root.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Tony Luck
<tony.luck@...el.com>, "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Biswapriyo Nath <nathbappai@...il.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, linux@...nlining.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: Add Redmi Note 8T
On 2026-01-16 10:53, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 1/16/26 7:53 AM, barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org wrote:
>> On 2026-01-13 10:04, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 1/12/26 9:13 PM, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
>>>> Redmi Note 8T (willow) is very similar to Redmi Note 8 (ginkgo)
>>>> the only difference is willow have NFC.
>>>> Make a common base from ginkgo devicetree for both device.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
>>>> index 163ecdc7fd6c..70be19357d11 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
>>>> @@ -1,304 +1,12 @@
>>>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>>>> /*
>>>> - * Copyright (c) 2025, Gabriel Gonzales <semfault@...root.org>
>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2026, Barnabas Czeman
>>>
>>> Is there a reason for you to remove Gabriel's copyright from the 5
>>> LoC
>>> that remain in this file?
>> The original file was renamed to sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo-common.dtsi.
>> I have not removed it, it is a new file with the old file name but
>> i can add Gabriel's copyright here also, would that be fine?
>
> Well you certainly don't seem to have contributed anything additionally
> in this specific patch, other than splitting a source file into two
> source files, so the rule of the land is to generally keep the
> copyrights
> as-is
I have kept the Copyright in the original file. The question is should I
add it here also?
>
> Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists