lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d310d788-b6df-47dc-9557-643813351838@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 12:24:55 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
 Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
 "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 04/20] slab: add sheaves to most caches

On 1/16/26 06:45, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 3:17 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>>
>> In the first step to replace cpu (partial) slabs with sheaves, enable
>> sheaves for almost all caches. Treat args->sheaf_capacity as a minimum,
>> and calculate sheaf capacity with a formula that roughly follows the
>> formula for number of objects in cpu partial slabs in set_cpu_partial().
>>
>> This should achieve roughly similar contention on the barn spin lock as
>> there's currently for node list_lock without sheaves, to make
>> benchmarking results comparable. It can be further tuned later.
>>
>> Don't enable sheaves for bootstrap caches as that wouldn't work. In
>> order to recognize them by SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT, make sure the flag exists
>> even for !CONFIG_SLAB_OBJ_EXT.
>>
>> This limitation will be lifted for kmalloc caches after the necessary
>> bootstrapping changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> 
> One nit but otherwise LGTM.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>

Thanks.

>> ---
>>  include/linux/slab.h |  6 ------
>>  mm/slub.c            | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
>> index 2482992248dc..2682ee57ec90 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>> @@ -57,9 +57,7 @@ enum _slab_flag_bits {
>>  #endif
>>         _SLAB_OBJECT_POISON,
>>         _SLAB_CMPXCHG_DOUBLE,
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_OBJ_EXT
>>         _SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT,
>> -#endif
>>         _SLAB_FLAGS_LAST_BIT
>>  };
>>
>> @@ -238,11 +236,7 @@ enum _slab_flag_bits {
>>  #define SLAB_TEMPORARY         SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT    /* Objects are short-lived */
>>
>>  /* Slab created using create_boot_cache */
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_OBJ_EXT
>>  #define SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT                __SLAB_FLAG_BIT(_SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT)
>> -#else
>> -#define SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT                __SLAB_FLAG_UNUSED
>> -#endif
>>
>>  /*
>>   * ZERO_SIZE_PTR will be returned for zero sized kmalloc requests.
>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>> index 8ffeb3ab3228..6e05e3cc5c49 100644
>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -7857,6 +7857,48 @@ static void set_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s)
>>  #endif
>>  }
>>
>> +static unsigned int calculate_sheaf_capacity(struct kmem_cache *s,
>> +                                            struct kmem_cache_args *args)
>> +
>> +{
>> +       unsigned int capacity;
>> +       size_t size;
>> +
>> +
>> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_TINY) || s->flags & SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS)
>> +               return 0;
>> +
>> +       /* bootstrap caches can't have sheaves for now */
>> +       if (s->flags & SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT)
>> +               return 0;
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * For now we use roughly similar formula (divided by two as there are
>> +        * two percpu sheaves) as what was used for percpu partial slabs, which
>> +        * should result in similar lock contention (barn or list_lock)
>> +        */
>> +       if (s->size >= PAGE_SIZE)
>> +               capacity = 4;
>> +       else if (s->size >= 1024)
>> +               capacity = 12;
>> +       else if (s->size >= 256)
>> +               capacity = 26;
>> +       else
>> +               capacity = 60;
>> +
>> +       /* Increment capacity to make sheaf exactly a kmalloc size bucket */
>> +       size = struct_size_t(struct slab_sheaf, objects, capacity);
>> +       size = kmalloc_size_roundup(size);
>> +       capacity = (size - struct_size_t(struct slab_sheaf, objects, 0)) / sizeof(void *);
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * Respect an explicit request for capacity that's typically motivated by
>> +        * expected maximum size of kmem_cache_prefill_sheaf() to not end up
>> +        * using low-performance oversize sheaves
>> +        */
>> +       return max(capacity, args->sheaf_capacity);
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * calculate_sizes() determines the order and the distribution of data within
>>   * a slab object.
>> @@ -7991,6 +8033,10 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache_args *args, struct kmem_cache *s)
>>         if (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT)
>>                 s->allocflags |= __GFP_RECLAIMABLE;
>>
>> +       /* kmalloc caches need extra care to support sheaves */
>> +       if (!is_kmalloc_cache(s))
> 
> nit: All the checks for the cases when sheaves should not be used
> (like SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS and SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT) are done inside
> calculate_sheaf_capacity(). Only this is_kmalloc_cache() one is here.
> It would be nice to have all of them in the same place but maybe you
> have a reason for keeping it here?

Yeah, in "slab: handle kmalloc sheaves bootstrap" we call
calculate_sheaf_capacity() from another place for kmalloc normal caches so
the check has to be outside.

>> +               s->sheaf_capacity = calculate_sheaf_capacity(s, args);
>> +
>>         /*
>>          * Determine the number of objects per slab
>>          */
>> @@ -8595,15 +8641,12 @@ int do_kmem_cache_create(struct kmem_cache *s, const char *name,
>>
>>         set_cpu_partial(s);
>>
>> -       if (args->sheaf_capacity && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_TINY)
>> -                                       && !(s->flags & SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS)) {
>> +       if (s->sheaf_capacity) {
>>                 s->cpu_sheaves = alloc_percpu(struct slub_percpu_sheaves);
>>                 if (!s->cpu_sheaves) {
>>                         err = -ENOMEM;
>>                         goto out;
>>                 }
>> -               // TODO: increase capacity to grow slab_sheaf up to next kmalloc size?
>> -               s->sheaf_capacity = args->sheaf_capacity;
>>         }
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>>
>> --
>> 2.52.0
>>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ