lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52a9988c-323c-4b2b-be75-896a2db27f94@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:48:38 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Abdurrahman Hussain <abdurrahman@...thop.ai>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: dt-bindings: xilinx: make interrupts optional

On 17/01/2026 00:35, Abdurrahman Hussain wrote:
> This makes the driver work on platforms where interrupts are either not
> provided or broken.

You need to describe the hardware instead. Why interrupts are optional
in the hardware (or are they even?).

> 
> Signed-off-by: Abdurrahman Hussain <abdurrahman@...thop.ai>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-xilinx.yaml | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-xilinx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-xilinx.yaml
> index 4beb3af0416d..8296edde61b0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-xilinx.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-xilinx.yaml
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ properties:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
>    interrupts:
> -    maxItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 1 # optional

Drop comment, pointless. Schema defines that.

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC (and consider --no-git-fallback argument, so you will
not CC people just because they made one commit years ago). It might
happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated
entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux
kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ