[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260117120632.75e3c394@pumpkin>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 12:06:32 +0000
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Weigang He <geoffreyhe2@...il.com>, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: fix missing null termination after
copy_from_user()
On Sat, 17 Jan 2026 10:58:41 +0100
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 09:46:31AM +0000, Weigang He wrote:
> > The buffer 'buf' is filled by copy_from_user() but is not properly
> > null-terminated before being used with strncmp(). If userspace provides
> > fewer than 10 bytes, strncmp() may read beyond the copied data into
> > uninitialized stack memory.
>
> But that's fine, it will not match the check, and so it will stop when
> told, so no overflow happens anywhere.
That's not entirely true.
If the user passes "complianc" (without a '\0') and the on-stack buf[9]
happens to be 'e' then the test will succeed rather than fail.
But the only thing that will get upset is KASAN.
More 'interestingly':
- why is it min_t() not min(), everything is size_t.
- why sizeof(buf) - 1, reading into the last byte won't matter.
- why buf[32] not buf[10], even [16] would be plenty for 'future expansion'.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists