[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260117232006.1000673-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 15:20:06 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: daniel@...rotopia.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
michael@...sekall.de,
linux@...linux.org.uk,
edumazet@...gle.com,
andrew@...n.ch,
olek2@...pl,
davem@...emloft.net,
vladimir.oltean@....com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [v2,2/5] net: phy: realtek: simplify C22 reg access via MDIO_MMD_VEND2
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
net: phy: realtek: simplify C22 reg access via MDIO_MMD_VEND2
This commit adds support for translating MDIO_MMD_VEND2 registers back
to Clause-22 registers for PHYs on a C22-only bus. It also renames
RTL_PHYSR to RTL_VND2_PHYSR and changes the register access method in
several read_status functions.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/realtek/realtek_main.c b/drivers/net/phy/realtek/realtek_main.c
> index a593150b6cbb..40cae9968d20 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/realtek/realtek_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/realtek/realtek_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,8 @@ static int rtlgen_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
> if (!phydev->link)
> return 0;
>
> - val = phy_read(phydev, RTL_PHYSR);
> + val = phy_read_paged(phydev, RTL822X_VND2_TO_PAGE(RTL_VND2_PHYSR),
> + RTL822X_VND2_TO_PAGE_REG(RTL_VND2_PHYSR));
This changes rtlgen_read_status() from reading C22 register MII_RESV2
(0x1a) directly to using paged access at page 0xa43, register 18.
rtlgen_read_status() is used by RTL8211F, RTL8211F-VD, and Generic FE-GE
Realtek PHY drivers. Are these Gigabit-only PHYs guaranteed to have the
PHYSR at the same paged location as the RTL822x 2.5GbE PHYs?
I notice this change is reverted in a later commit in the series:
efef1a8042ec ("net: phy: realtek: demystify PHYSR register location")
which changes back to:
val = phy_read(phydev, RTL_PHYSR);
with the note "Turns out that register address RTL_VND2_PHYSR (0xa434)
maps to Clause-22 register MII_RESV2".
Is the paged access in this intermediate commit correct, or could it
cause issues during bisection?
[ ... ]
> @@ -2127,7 +2137,7 @@ static int rtlgen_sfp_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
> if (!phydev->link)
> return 0;
>
> - val = phy_read(phydev, RTL_PHYSR);
> + val = rtlgen_read_vend2(phydev, RTL_VND2_PHYSR);
Similarly, this changes from C22 register read to C45 MDIO_MMD_VEND2
access via rtlgen_read_vend2(). The SFP PHY mode uses PHY_IS_INTERNAL
and is used by r8169 for 2.5GbE chips in SFP mode.
This is also reverted in the same later commit to:
val = phy_read(phydev, RTL_PHYSR);
Does rtlgen_read_vend2() work correctly for all PHYs that could be in
SFP mode?
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists