[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_08C319B2F9CDBDCAD20B0D380C4CDB7CF406@qq.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 17:14:49 +0800
From: "shengminghu512" <shengminghu512@...com>
To: "broonie" <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "hu.shengming" <hu.shengming@....com.cn>, "zhang.run" <zhang.run@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog/softlockup: Fix sample ring index wrap in need_counting_irqs()
From: Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@....com.cn>
cpustat_tail indexes cpustat_util[], which is a NUM_SAMPLE_PERIODS-sized
ring buffer. need_counting_irqs() currently wraps the index using
NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT, which only happens to match NUM_SAMPLE_PERIODS.
Use NUM_SAMPLE_PERIODS for the wrap to keep the ring math correct even if
the NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT or NUM_SAMPLE_PERIODS changes.
Signed-off-by: Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@....com.cn>
---
kernel/watchdog.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index b4d5fbdb9..7d675781b 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static bool need_counting_irqs(void)
u8 util;
int tail = __this_cpu_read(cpustat_tail);
- tail = (tail + NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT - 1) % NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT;
+ tail = (tail + NUM_SAMPLE_PERIODS - 1) % NUM_SAMPLE_PERIODS;
util = __this_cpu_read(cpustat_util[tail][STATS_HARDIRQ]);
return util > HARDIRQ_PERCENT_THRESH;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists