lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67e5482b-93ed-4b5f-8375-f7e68c50a436@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 09:38:36 +0100
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...il.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
 Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
 Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
 Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
 Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
 Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
 Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, Josh Triplett
 <josh@...htriplett.org>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...ux.dev>,
 FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] rust: sync: atomic: Add Atomic<*mut T> support

On 17.01.26 13:22, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Atomic pointer support is an important piece of synchronization
> algorithm, e.g. RCU, hence provide the support for that.
> 
> Note that instead of relying on atomic_long or the implementation of
> `Atomic<usize>`, a new set of helpers (atomic_ptr_*) is introduced for
> atomic pointer specifically, this is because ptr2int casting would
> lose the provenance of a pointer and even though in theory there are a
> few tricks the provenance can be restored, it'll still be a simpler
> implementation if C could provide atomic pointers directly. The side
> effects of this approach are: we don't have the arithmetic and logical
> operations for pointers yet and the current implementation only works
> on ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW architectures, but these are implementation
> issues and can be added later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> ---
>  rust/helpers/atomic_ext.c            |  3 +++
>  rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs           | 12 +++++++++++-
>  rust/kernel/sync/atomic/internal.rs  | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>  rust/kernel/sync/atomic/predefine.rs | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rust/helpers/atomic_ext.c b/rust/helpers/atomic_ext.c
> index 240218e2e708..c267d5190529 100644
> --- a/rust/helpers/atomic_ext.c
> +++ b/rust/helpers/atomic_ext.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ __rust_helper void rust_helper_atomic_##tname##_set_release(type *ptr, type val)
>  
>  GEN_READ_SET_HELPERS(i8, s8)
>  GEN_READ_SET_HELPERS(i16, s16)
> +GEN_READ_SET_HELPERS(ptr, const void *)
>  
>  /*
>   * xchg helpers depend on ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW and on the
> @@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ rust_helper_atomic_##tname##_xchg##suffix(type *ptr, type new)			\
>  
>  GEN_XCHG_HELPERS(i8, s8)
>  GEN_XCHG_HELPERS(i16, s16)
> +GEN_XCHG_HELPERS(ptr, const void *)
>  
>  /*
>   * try_cmpxchg helpers depend on ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW and on the
> @@ -82,3 +84,4 @@ rust_helper_atomic_##tname##_try_cmpxchg##suffix(type *ptr, type *old, type new)
>  
>  GEN_TRY_CMPXCHG_HELPERS(i8, s8)
>  GEN_TRY_CMPXCHG_HELPERS(i16, s16)
> +GEN_TRY_CMPXCHG_HELPERS(ptr, const void *)
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs
> index 4aebeacb961a..4d2a5228c2e4 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs
> @@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
>  #[repr(transparent)]
>  pub struct Atomic<T: AtomicType>(AtomicRepr<T::Repr>);
>  
> +// SAFETY: `Atomic<T>` is safe to transfer between execution contexts because of the safety
> +// requirement of `AtomicType`.
> +unsafe impl<T: AtomicType> Send for Atomic<T> {}
> +
>  // SAFETY: `Atomic<T>` is safe to share among execution contexts because all accesses are atomic.
>  unsafe impl<T: AtomicType> Sync for Atomic<T> {}
>  
> @@ -68,6 +72,11 @@ unsafe impl<T: AtomicType> Sync for Atomic<T> {}
>  ///
>  /// - [`Self`] must have the same size and alignment as [`Self::Repr`].
>  /// - [`Self`] must be [round-trip transmutable] to  [`Self::Repr`].
> +/// - [`Self`] must be safe to transfer between execution contexts, if it's [`Send`], this is
> +///   automatically satisfied. The exception is pointer types that are even though marked as
> +///   `!Send` (e.g. raw pointers and [`NonNull<T>`]) but requiring `unsafe` to do anything
> +///   meaningful on them. This is because transferring pointer values between execution contexts is
> +///   safe as long as the actual `unsafe` dereferencing is justified.
>  ///
>  /// Note that this is more relaxed than requiring the bi-directional transmutability (i.e.
>  /// [`transmute()`] is always sound between `U` and `T`) because of the support for atomic
> @@ -108,7 +117,8 @@ unsafe impl<T: AtomicType> Sync for Atomic<T> {}
>  /// [`transmute()`]: core::mem::transmute
>  /// [round-trip transmutable]: AtomicType#round-trip-transmutability
>  /// [Examples]: AtomicType#examples
> -pub unsafe trait AtomicType: Sized + Send + Copy {
> +/// [`NonNull<T>`]: core::ptr::NonNull
> +pub unsafe trait AtomicType: Sized + Copy {
>      /// The backing atomic implementation type.
>      type Repr: AtomicImpl;
>  }
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/internal.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/internal.rs
> index 0dac58bca2b3..93f5a7846645 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/internal.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/internal.rs
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  use crate::bindings;
>  use crate::macros::paste;
>  use core::cell::UnsafeCell;
> +use ffi::c_void;
>  
>  mod private {
>      /// Sealed trait marker to disable customized impls on atomic implementation traits.
> @@ -14,10 +15,11 @@ pub trait Sealed {}
>  }
>  
>  // The C side supports atomic primitives only for `i32` and `i64` (`atomic_t` and `atomic64_t`),
> -// while the Rust side also layers provides atomic support for `i8` and `i16`
> -// on top of lower-level C primitives.
> +// while the Rust side also provides atomic support for `i8`, `i16` and `*const c_void` on top of
> +// lower-level C primitives.
>  impl private::Sealed for i8 {}
>  impl private::Sealed for i16 {}
> +impl private::Sealed for *const c_void {}
>  impl private::Sealed for i32 {}
>  impl private::Sealed for i64 {}
>  
> @@ -26,10 +28,10 @@ impl private::Sealed for i64 {}
>  /// This trait is sealed, and only types that map directly to the C side atomics
>  /// or can be implemented with lower-level C primitives are allowed to implement this:
>  ///
> -/// - `i8` and `i16` are implemented with lower-level C primitives.
> +/// - `i8`, `i16` and `*const c_void` are implemented with lower-level C primitives.
>  /// - `i32` map to `atomic_t`
>  /// - `i64` map to `atomic64_t`
> -pub trait AtomicImpl: Sized + Send + Copy + private::Sealed {
> +pub trait AtomicImpl: Sized + Copy + private::Sealed {
>      /// The type of the delta in arithmetic or logical operations.
>      ///
>      /// For example, in `atomic_add(ptr, v)`, it's the type of `v`. Usually it's the same type of
> @@ -51,6 +53,13 @@ impl AtomicImpl for i16 {
>      type Delta = Self;
>  }
>  
> +// The current helpers of load/store uses `{WRITE,READ}_ONCE()` hence the atomicity is only

uses -> use ?

> +// guaranteed against read-modify-write operations if the architecture supports native atomic RmW.
> +#[cfg(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW)]
> +impl AtomicImpl for *const c_void {
> +    type Delta = isize;
> +}

Are all users of this guarded with CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW as
well? Or do we want (need?) to cover the
non-CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW cases where someone tries to use
this as well?

Best regards

Dirk




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ